<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a prius? &#8211; no thanks I&#8217;ll stick to the crx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raif.com/2008/07/15/a-prius-no-thanks-ill-stick-to-the-crx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raif.com/2008/07/15/a-prius-no-thanks-ill-stick-to-the-crx/</link>
	<description>raif's random rants...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:05:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.raif.com/2008/07/15/a-prius-no-thanks-ill-stick-to-the-crx/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raif.com/?p=35#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Quincy,

You&#039;ve got a good point. However, my focus was on the gas efficiency of the vehicles and that 60 mpg is really not earth shattering. I&#039;ll be a lot more impressed when the plug-in hybrids hit the mainstream at 150 mpg.

Thanks for the note.
-raif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quincy,</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got a good point. However, my focus was on the gas efficiency of the vehicles and that 60 mpg is really not earth shattering. I&#8217;ll be a lot more impressed when the plug-in hybrids hit the mainstream at 150 mpg.</p>
<p>Thanks for the note.<br />
-raif</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Import from China</title>
		<link>http://www.raif.com/2008/07/15/a-prius-no-thanks-ill-stick-to-the-crx/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Import from China</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raif.com/?p=35#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Great info - keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info &#8211; keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackhatseo</title>
		<link>http://www.raif.com/2008/07/15/a-prius-no-thanks-ill-stick-to-the-crx/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackhatseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raif.com/?p=35#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Added. Nice work on this one.  Btw, my blog is dofollow, stop by and grab a link.  Bompa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Added. Nice work on this one.  Btw, my blog is dofollow, stop by and grab a link.  Bompa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quincy</title>
		<link>http://www.raif.com/2008/07/15/a-prius-no-thanks-ill-stick-to-the-crx/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Quincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raif.com/?p=35#comment-14</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s all fine and dandy, except...

The CRX or the CV2 don&#039;t have things like antilock brakes, side-curtain airbags, crumple zones, electronic stability control.  THE PRIUS DOES.  If I have a family and safety is a concern, the Prius IS a much better choice.

Your info on the battery is wrong, by the way.   In the states with California-standard emissions regulations, the Prius battery warranty is for 10 years / 150,000-miles.   There are plenty of Priuses being used as taxi cabs in Vancouver and other cities that have gone more than 200,000 miles, and NONE OF THEM had battery failures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all fine and dandy, except&#8230;</p>
<p>The CRX or the CV2 don&#8217;t have things like antilock brakes, side-curtain airbags, crumple zones, electronic stability control.  THE PRIUS DOES.  If I have a family and safety is a concern, the Prius IS a much better choice.</p>
<p>Your info on the battery is wrong, by the way.   In the states with California-standard emissions regulations, the Prius battery warranty is for 10 years / 150,000-miles.   There are plenty of Priuses being used as taxi cabs in Vancouver and other cities that have gone more than 200,000 miles, and NONE OF THEM had battery failures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emin</title>
		<link>http://www.raif.com/2008/07/15/a-prius-no-thanks-ill-stick-to-the-crx/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Emin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 11:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raif.com/?p=35#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Nice data!  But there must be an accounting trick somewhere...  

I&#039;m pulling this outta my ass but maybe new vehicles are more recyclable or that they have a lot more HP (whether we need is another matter) or a lot less CO2 emissions which means more weight therefore less efficient etc.  

I&#039;ve read that during the development of Prius a Corolla burned 13 km/l, the goal for Prius was initially 20 km/l, eventually 2nd generation Prius got 23 km/l.   

*** Typo in the 2nd paragraph!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice data!  But there must be an accounting trick somewhere&#8230;  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m pulling this outta my ass but maybe new vehicles are more recyclable or that they have a lot more HP (whether we need is another matter) or a lot less CO2 emissions which means more weight therefore less efficient etc.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read that during the development of Prius a Corolla burned 13 km/l, the goal for Prius was initially 20 km/l, eventually 2nd generation Prius got 23 km/l.   </p>
<p>*** Typo in the 2nd paragraph!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
